The Texas Family Lawyer Podcast

Finding Hidden Money In A Texas Divorce

Hunt Law Firm, PLLC Episode 26

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 38:05

Money shouldn’t vanish just because a marriage ends. We walk through exactly how we uncover hidden assets and prove community waste in Texas divorces, from the first red flags to the final division. You’ll hear how we use discovery requests to peel back the lawyers of the financial onion. We also share the advanced tools that bring clarity to messy finances. Finally, we unpack community waste and how Texas courts fix the damage. 

If this episode helps you see your next step more clearly, subscribe, share with a friend who needs it, and let us know what topic you'd like to see us cover next!

FOLLOW  ▶
Web: https://www.familylawyerkaty.com
Facebook: @huntlawtexas
Instagram: @huntlawtexas
X/Twitter: @huntlawtexas
YouTube: @huntlawtexas

This podcast is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice. The information in this podcast is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Welcome And Topic Overview

SPEAKER_01

This is the Texas Family Lawyer Podcast. I'm Alex Hunt of Hunt Law Firm, a family law firm with offices in the greater Houston area. Today I am happy to be joined by David C. Adams, our lead attorney in our League City office. Welcome, David. Thank you, Alex. Glad to be here.

Red Flags For Hidden Assets

SPEAKER_01

Today we are going to be talking about what to do when your spouse is hiding assets in your Texas divorce. And we're really going to dig in. We're going to talk about how to find those hidden assets, what to do when your spouse is not cooperating with discovery requests, which is typically the way that we try to find those hidden assets. And what to do when your spouse has wasted money. You finally locate the assets and you realize that they are gone. So let's jump in. All right. So our first question today is going to be how to find assets that in your divorce case. And so in Texas divorces, uncovering hidden assets is critical for achieving a fair property division. Texas is a community property state. It's covered by the Family Code Chapter Three. All property that's acquired during the marriage is assumed to be community property unless you can prove by clear and convincing evidence that it is separate property. So oftentimes in the cases that we have, we might have one spouse that is trying to hide some of those assets. Tell me a little bit about uh David, some of those red flags or tactics that you see uh opposing parties using to try to hide their assets.

SPEAKER_00

The most common thing that we see is um failure to respond to discovery, right? People generally aren't going to want to turn over their financial documents and answer certain questions about their finances if they know that it might turn over something that's gonna hurt them or something suspicious. So that's usually the first red flag. And the second um red flag I would say is you know your client, right? Your client probably has a suspicion, oftentimes they will, that their spouse might be doing something um that they're not supposed to do. They may not be sure exactly what. Um and so that's why your you know your client interview and communications with your client can be important to at least give you a direction to to go in to know what you might be looking for.

SPEAKER_01

One of the things we often see is, you know, a lot of secretive behavior. I mean, you're in a you're in a a divorce case, and so obviously there's going to be it's an adversarial process, but you'll see the other party kind of behaving secretly, not just not responding to discovery requests, um, but you know, they're hiding what were previously uh community passwords for bank accounts, things like that. Sure. And now um they're they're changing those passwords, they're they're withholding things from their spouse. Um, and you know, our client or the the other spouse, they they can't access bank accounts, they can't see anything anymore. Um and and another one is just unexplained withdrawals or debts. And so one of the things that I often see is an opposing party will uh take out $100 here from the ATM. We're living in a an increasingly cashless world. So it's unusual when somebody is taking out $200, $300 every few days. The question is, where is that money going? It's unable to be tracked. Well, those are questions that you would need to get answered through a discovery

Core Discovery Tools Explained

SPEAKER_01

request. Absolutely. So tell me a little bit, David, about some of the formal discovery tools that we use as family law attorneys to try to identify some of these hidden assets.

SPEAKER_00

The most common tools for discovery is written discovery, and the the three common forms are written interrogatories, uh, request for production, and request for disclosure. Now, written interrogatories are are literally just questions on paper. They're asked to the opposing party that they have to respond to and then swear to the answers. Let's say that you had maybe gotten some financial documents from your client as part of the divorce, and it shows to the point that you just made earlier, it shows ATM withdrawals. You could write an interrogatory and say, you know, see the attached financial statement, this transaction on this day, that transaction on that day, explain or tell us where that money ended up. Um, you could be that specific. You know, you can also be more general in your written interrogatories. Tell us all bank accounts that you have and what the what institution they're located at, um, different things like that. The request for production um is gonna be really where you're gonna get the meat, right? You're gonna get the documents. Um you're gonna get the document financial documents that are gonna form the basis of of your case. And you know, one thing I have to tell clients that sometimes can be frustrating if they've been married for a long time. Unfortunately, most financial institutions only keep financial records back about seven years. Right. Um, there are a few exceptions, sometimes they'll surprise you, but generally speaking, that's as far back as they'll go. So even if you go to your bank or the opposing party goes to their bank, or even if you were to say use a subpoena, which I'm sure we'll talk about in a minute to try to get records, the most you can usually hope for is about seven years worth of records. Um but that's request for production is where you'll get that. You can get, you know, financial statements, you can get credit card statements, tax returns, uh, pay stubs. Um sometimes tax returns and pay stubs can be very helpful. You know, I've I've worked a lot of cases where a spouse is having their check direct deposited to a joint account. The other spouse doesn't know that for years they've also had a second hidden account and they've had a portion of their paycheck, which you can now see on their pay stub that's in direct deposited to that account. So that can be very helpful.

SPEAKER_01

So those are the the easier ways in order to try to get information in a divorce. You're literally asking the other party, give me information, give me bank statements, answer these questions for me. But

Depositions And Third-Party Subpoenas

SPEAKER_01

if you have an opposing party that's going to uh play hardball, they're not going to follow the rules. There are some less common tools that we typically use. The first one is doing a deposition. That's where you're literally sitting at a table with a court reporter, sometimes a videographer, and you are the lawyer is asking questions under oath to that party. And that party has an obligation under the law to answer those questions truthfully. But if you'd believe it out there, viewers, sometimes people don't answer those questions truthfully, or they still try to hide facts. And so there are additional uh things that we can do outside of asking the other party for help in identifying those assets. And so those look like, David, you mentioned subpoenas. Tell us a little bit about how that can be helpful in identifying hidden assets.

SPEAKER_00

There are two different kinds of subpoenas that you can issue. There's one called a subpoena deucisticum, which is where you issue a subpoena to a person or to an entity like a banking institution and say, we want you to show up at this hearing or at this trial and testify and potentially bring documents with you when you come to that. Um, I generally counsel clients that that's kind of our last resort, because it's generally not advised to have a hearing or a trial where a witness is going to show up, A, to say things you're not sure what they're gonna say, and B, to bring documents you've never seen before. But sometimes that is the way you have to go. There's another type of subpoena that you can issue to third parties to have them show up and essentially do the same thing, but to have them show up at a neutral location, like your law office, and produce uh documents at that location. And so usually the way the process typically works in litigation, you issue your written discovery request to the opposing party, you give them an opportunity to see what they're going to respond with and what they're gonna say. You usually uh will draft and send what's called a deficiency letter and say, here's how the responses you've given us are deficient. And then oftentimes you'll have a motion to compel discovery hearing. And after that step in the process is usually when I turn to a client and I say, Look, I don't think that the uh I think the opposing party is gonna continue

Private Investigators And Tracing

SPEAKER_00

to try to play games with us. It might be money better spent for us to issue a subpoena directly to the bank or to the employer or to the whatever company we might be seeking records from and see if we can get the information directly from them.

SPEAKER_01

And occasionally you'll have somebody who is not following the rules. You're not even able to identify where they bank and where they hold money. And in that instance, one option is to utilize a private investigator. Usually, when people think of private investigators, you think of somebody that's tailing your spouse and seeing if they're having an affair or they're going here or they're going there. But private investigators, specifically ones with a background in um forensics, can uh and and financial forensics can uh run a search and they can identify, at least within the state of Texas, or you could do it on a state-by-state basis, where that person has bank accounts. They're not going to be able to tell you how much money is in those bank accounts, um, but they'll be able to say they have a bank uh account at Chase or at Wells Fargo. And that allows us as the attorneys to then go and issue a subpoena to Chase or Wells Fargo and go and get those records. So all hope is not lost if um they're truly the other side is truly not giving any type of information whatsoever.

Forensic Accountants And Cash Flow Maps

SPEAKER_01

That's right. So, so David, let's say we finally get the records. They are filled with um information that we can't really make heads or tails of it. The client doesn't know what these transactions are. We're trying to trace money that's coming in and out of the accounts. One option that we have then is to hire a forensic accountant that can help us figure out what's going on with these accounts. Tell us a little bit about what a forensic accountant can do.

SPEAKER_00

What a forensic accountant can do is that they can go in and analyze what's often thousands of pages of financial documents. And um, they have different. I've I've worked with a few, and one of them has showed me before some of the software that they use. You know, they have some different programs that they have available to them that most of us don't have that allow them um to be able to much more quickly piece together what you know what money is going out and then into different places so that you can see a flow of cash or a flow of assets. Um and that can be very helpful not only in being able to tell you as the litigator, you know, maybe what's going on, but you can also potentially call them as a witness at your hearing or at your trial to fortify your case that maybe the other spouse has been wasteful or fraudulent.

SPEAKER_01

And in addition to analyzing bank records and using some advanced tracing methods, um, they can also look at things like bank records, uh, business records for underreported income or sometimes fake expenses. We see that sometimes. There's it's money that is fraudulently going to people, uh, that it looks like a business expense on a business financial statement, but it really isn't. And they can help us identify that. Um give us some advice that you would have uh for somebody that's out there looking that that might be faced with a situation where they've got a spouse in a divorce that is not forthcoming with information.

Pre-Filing Prep And Safe Document Storage

SPEAKER_01

What advice would you have for them?

SPEAKER_00

Uh I would say if you're pre-filing for divorce, um, I would say that you want to do your homework and try to get your hands on as many documents as you can and save those documents to someplace that's safe and secure that you know the other party doesn't have access to. Oftentimes there's a gap in time between, say, filing for divorce and being able to get out discovery requests, or even in some cases, if you serve discovery requests with a divorce filing, there's still a period of time, so uh usually 30, sometimes up to 50 days that these parties have to respond to these requests. And there's a lot that they can do and hide and delete uh in that kind of time frame. So I would say if you're a spouse that's worried about that kind of behavior, you definitely want to try to take what steps you can to secure the documents and and the evidence that you can. It doesn't have to be perfect, right? I mean, it, you know, sometimes anything can help or can point us as the litigator or the financial expert in the right direction.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, and start, like you said, start gathering those documents early. Um, I don't think that it's particularly helpful for our clients to confront their spouse about, you know, certain types of spending, but keep logs of it. Get the financial records when you can, keep it safe. Don't keep it where your spouse has access to it and can withhold it from you or can uh delete it. And um remain proactive in monitoring your accounts and take screenshots when you see activity that is unusual and take note of it. Because anytime that you can take note of it and draw it to your attorney's attention, that's going to be less time that your attorney needs to go and do the digging because you're doing that work on the front end. Um and and then the last piece of advice, which uh it might be obvious, is you know, get a legal professional, get an attorney on board as soon as possible because they're gonna be able to guide you through this process. It's very complex. There's very complicated laws that are at play here. Um, and a lawyer is attuned to what is necessary in order to prove these claims in court, they're gonna be able to help you guide you through that process.

SPEAKER_00

Absolutely.

When A Spouse Stonewalls Discovery

SPEAKER_01

All right, David, our next question is uh what to do when your spouse isn't cooperating in your Texas divorce? Particularly, you've sent discovery requests to try to get information from your spouse and they're not answering those discovery requests. So, first, let's just briefly go over what some of those discovery requests uh that you could send to the other side to try to get information. What are those discovery requests?

SPEAKER_00

So you have the most common ones a request for production, which is where you request a party to produce items. Generally, it's going to be statements, right? Financial documents, uh, tax records, pay stubs. Those those are gonna be the common things. Um, if custody is an issue in your case, you might be requesting text messages, emails. Um those would be the most common things that you would request in a request for production. Written interrogatories are questions on paper that you ask to the other party. You ask them to answer those questions in writing, and then they're supposed to literally swear, have notarized um, or declare that those answers are true and accurate. Um there's another uh thing called request for disclosure, which normally is answered by the attorney that's representing the party. But one of the features that is important in requests for disclosure is that parties have to disclose what are called their uh factual bases and legal theories that support their case. So, for instance, if you were coming after your spouse saying that they had wasted community assets, you would need to point that out in your request for disclosure and do so adequately enough ahead of trial so that everybody knew that was a claim that you were making. There's also, uh, although not as commonly used, request for admission, which um the way to think about that, I explain it to clients, is it's kind of like truefalse. You write a series of questions that are basically admit or deny this thing, admit or deny that you have an overseas bank account, admit or deny that you, you know, had a sexual relationship outside of the marriage. And then the other party has to literally admit or deny a true or false uh each statement. Sometimes, um, depending on the question, sometimes that can be helpful. Uh it's an easy

Motions To Compel And Sanctions

SPEAKER_00

and quick way to let you know if if you're thinking about a topic or an issue is correct or wrong. Um and especially if the other side say isn't represented by a lawyer, but sometimes even when they are, if you miss the deadline to properly respond to those requests for admission, they're deemed admitted, which means they're all taken as true. Um, and it can be complicated and and difficult sometimes to get those uh deemed those admissions withdrawn if you've missed your deadline.

SPEAKER_01

So you've sent these written discovery requests to the other side. They have an obligation to answer those written discovery requests in writing within 30 days. Um occasionally on cases, we will get written discovery requests that are insufficient that responses are insufficient. So while they answer, they really don't give us the information that we truly need, or they only give us partial information. And then sometimes we just don't get a response back at all after 30 days. Correct. So what we typically do is we try to resolve it informally first. We'll reach out to the other side, we'll send them a deficiency letter, which tells them uh if you did answer or you gave partial information, then there's additional information that we need. We give them a deadline, we say this is what we need you to do. We need you to remove your objections, we need you to give us additional bank statements, we need you to give us additional information and an answer, and we need you to answer it by next Friday. And if they don't answer it by next Friday, our next step is we go to our client, we say we need to file a motion to compel responses, which is a court proceeding in which we go to court and we ask the judge to force them to answer, and there's potential penalties that are associated with that. Tell me a little bit more about the process to bring a motion to compel and what the outcome could be in court.

SPEAKER_00

The most important thing is the step before the compel, which is the deficiency letter. Uh, and the reason I say that is because the the the way I I conduct my motions to compel, and I think most other lawyers I think do a good job at this, is your deficiency letter needs to very specifically lay out what has been produced by the opposing party and and and what you're missing. Um, I think if you send a letter that just says, hey, we have some problems and you're not specific about what they are, or you say, here's what I'm missing, but maybe you don't say what they did give you, um, you know, I've I've found that when you go to these hearings, there's a lot of back, there can be a lot of back and forth about, oh, I gave that to you, right? Or I I I gave you this and I gave you that. And so if your letter very clearly lays out, here's what I have, here's what I don't have, here's what I need, um, that's the best basis for the motion to compel. When you go to the hearing, one of the biggest things, and I try to tell my clients this sometimes when the other side is saying that we haven't properly produced something or enough information, I tell them, look, anytime you go to a motion to compel hearing, you're gonna run the risk that you're gonna have to pay the other side's attorneys fees that are associated with the motion to compel. So if you don't, you know, if you don't want to do that, you want to make sure that you try to comply as as fully and completely as you can. And I would say, well, not always, I would say more times than not, when you go to those compels, the judges are often awarding some amount, maybe not everything you're asking for, but they're often awarding some amount of attorney's fees

Client Best Practices To Reduce Costs

SPEAKER_00

to the other side.

SPEAKER_01

And there's got to be some sort of penalty when the other side doesn't follow the rules. So we've got the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. It outlines discovery requests and it says that you have to answer within 30 days. And if you just don't answer or you answer so incompletely, and then you get a, you know, kind of polite, informal request from the other side, I need additional information, and you just don't provide it. I mean, it's really contemptible behavior, and the judge has to issue some sort of penalty. And so the first time, you're usually going to get the court to issue an order that's going to say that you have to answer it completely, and they're going to issue some sort of uh attorney's fees to compensate the side that was asking for it, didn't get it. They've got to, you've got to compensate their attorney. Um, but if after the second time or the third time that you don't answer and you have to go back to the court again to get assistance, then you start getting into uh possible penalties that can really impact your case upon final trial. We call them kind of informally a death penalty sanction. That's right. Which means that the court could order that you can't bring any witnesses at the final trial. You can't bring any evidence at the final trial. And um, you know, even if you're not a lawyer, you can imagine not

Defining Community Waste In Texas

SPEAKER_01

being able to bring witnesses in your divorce trial or not being able to present evidence in your divorce trial. This reason it's called a death penalty, it kills your case. You can't present your case and it puts you at an extreme disadvantage. So that is the biggest penalty that a court can impose in a motion to compel. And um, I I would avoid it at all costs. We certainly caution our clients before you decide not to provide proper responses, think about the potential consequences.

SPEAKER_00

That's absolutely right.

SPEAKER_01

So let's talk a little bit about best practices and and and just some words of caution for um anybody that might be out there and words of caution that we give to our clients. So the first thing that I would recommend that folks do is to always document your attempts to get your needed discovery. That's going to help set you up for success if you have to do a motion at compared to. Hell, or if you have to go and try to go and seek some penalties against the other side. We save all of the email threads that we have with the other side, any deficiency letters or correspondence that we send to the other side trying to informally resolve the case without having to go to court. But judges have pretty broad power to impose penalties. And especially once they've ordered responses to be given to the other side, they they typically have little tolerance for people playing games and withholding information. So the advice that I always have for my clients, I'm sure you do for yours, is be very careful. If you're the one that's withholding documents about what the potential consequences are. And if we're on the other side where we're uh requesting documents, we're going to cross every T and we're going to dot every I and we're going to get those documents eventually. Or we're going to make it so difficult for you to prove your case in final trial that it's going to bite you in the behind in the end. What other advice do you give to clients, or uh would you have for viewers that are facing a spouse that is refusing to provide information?

Burden Shifts And Proving Waste

SPEAKER_00

Uh well, one one thing, one piece of advice I would have for our clients, um, I I always try to tell our clients now is um when we send you the discovery request that the other side has given us, start working on it, start working on it now. Um what I find in most of the cases is that the clients don't produce something not because they're trying, at least our clients, not because they're trying to hide it, but because it's just tedious and cumbersome and a pain in the butt to do it. And there's there is no doubt about that. That is the truth. Well, in a lot of ways, discovery is kind of like a big homework assignment. But the truth is that it's not only very important to the case, but as we talked about, there are serious penalties um that could that that can be very, very harmful to your case and costly financially if you don't do that. So I I try to encourage the clients, as much as you may not like it, as much as you may not understand why your tax return from seven years ago is really relevant to your divorce case now, if they're asking for it and a judge is likely to think it's relevant, we need to turn it over. The other piece of advice that I would give um, if you're concerned that the other side might be hiding assets or not being compliant with discovery, is A, um give me as much help as you can. As in if there are documents that you can get, whether that's at your house, if they're in a financial account somewhere that you can access, um, do that because it's definitely going to be faster and cheaper for everybody if I can get them from you in some fashion rather than having to compel or force the other side to do it. You did mention something earlier that I do think is important. No, no one in a divorce

Reconstituting The Community Estate

SPEAKER_00

case um you know, should try to confront their spouse about fraud or about waste or about, you know, I know you're hiding X, Y, and Z. Those conversations in my mind usually aren't very productive, A, and sometimes can be dangerous. Um, and you definitely don't want to uh take documents by breaking into something, whatever that something might be, a filing cabinet or an email account um that you're not supposed to have access to. Having said that, everything is community property. Well, everything that's not separate property is presumed to be community property. And if you're married, there's a and and you do have access to it, if the filing cabinet's not locked and it's in your home, um arguably you've got free range to whatever's inside that cabinet. And if there's documents in there that might help us, it might be a good idea for us to utilize that. Um so you know, help me as much as you can. The other thing that I would say is look, it's not uh cheap when we have to go through thousands and thousands of pages of documents. So sometimes a client will come to me and they'll say, Here's five thousand pages worth of bank statements. Um, I don't trust my spouse. Figure out if he's been doing something suspicious, which we can do. Right. It's a lot uh more beneficial, I think, for the client and cheaper for them if they come to me and they say, Here's 5,000 pages worth of documents. I've gone through here and highlighted all of the charges that I think are suspicious. Um, this will give you a starting place. Please take this and run with it. That's a lot cheaper for the client and it it helps me um zero in on what's really important.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, our next topic is uh what to do when your spouse has wasted money in a Texas divorce. So particularly, we're talking about community waste, and that has a very specific definition in the Texas family code, and it refers to a spouse's reckless or intentional depletion

When The Estate Can’t Make You Whole

SPEAKER_01

of community property. And that's usually through excess spending or gifting or gambling or just outright fraud, it could be constructive fraud or actual fraud. That sec that uh section for those who might be dealing with this and are looking at for specific code sections would be uh chapter three of the Texas Family Code. And all assets acquired during the marriage belong to the community. And one of the things folks don't realize is that even if you receive income as a result of your employment or you uh are the one that is managing funds that you've gotten through your employment, you have a fiduciary duty to your spouse to handle that money responsibly and reasonably. And if you fail to do that, then your partner, your spouse in a divorce could have a claim to community waste. So give give us some examples that you've seen in your practice of uh wasteful spending that could uh classify as community waste in a Texas divorce.

SPEAKER_00

Well, um remember, waste uh it's I think it's important for clients to keep in mind that waste waste is relative. So by that I mean, you know, if the if the income of the community estate on a yearly basis is say $500,000, um, the court or jury is probably not gonna think that uh driving around in a $150,000 car

Documentation, Consent, And Final Advice

SPEAKER_00

is as wasteful as they might think if the you know community estate's net income on a yearly basis is significantly lower. Um and that's a lot of times what I I I run into is you know two situations is one where people have pulled money out of the estate or pulled money out of accounts, and it's not sure people aren't sure where it went or what they did with it. And that's honestly an easier legal case to make because the way the family code is written and the case law sets that up. Essentially, if you can prove that money has gone out, then the burden shifts to the other side for them to say what happened to it and what they did with it and to justify it. And presumably, if you can show that it went out and their justification doesn't make sense or isn't believable, then that should establish and prove a waste claim on your client's behalf. Um but the other issue that I run into and and frequently see is where people essentially are living beyond their means. They're spending every dime. And in some of those cases, if both parties have basically been agreeing to live that way, it's a lot harder to make that to make a waste case. But if one of the spouses has essentially been in control of the finances and they've been the one that's been doing the majority of the spending, and the other spouse hasn't been in agreement with that, then you can have the basis for a waste claim in those cases.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, an incredibly important part of a waste claim is that the other side didn't have knowledge and didn't consent to the behavior. So we've I I personally had a case where somebody was spending an inordinate amount of money on uh, you know, like a vehicle that he had. You know, he went and got a very expensive vehicle. He already had a vehicle, he went and got another vehicle, he was fixing up the vehicle. Uh, his spouse didn't know about that, didn't consent to it. That's wasteful spending. Um, and uh if you're just talking about, you know, either go on vacations together, that's obviously uh, you know, that's their lifestyle. They've consented to it, they went on the vacation. That's not what's going to qualify. And then you have some aspects that are just outright fraud. When you take money and, you know, you say, Oh, I've got a divorce coming up. I have $20,000 in a bank account. Let me transfer this to my brother or my sister or my father or my friend. That's just outright fraud because you're trying to withhold that money from the other spouse. You're taking it out of the community estate. So what happens? Um, you you talked a little bit about proving the claim. Um, we make the claim that there is uh community waste. We show that there was no knowledge, that there was no consent, the burden shifts to the other side. Let's say that the judge says, I agree. There was no knowledge, there was no consent, and this is lavish, uh uh extravagant spending. What would happen next is that you have what's called a reconstitution of the community estate. Tell us a little bit about what that means.

SPEAKER_00

So remember, when you sit down to do a divorce, you you basically start with a spreadsheet, right? And you try to build up on your spreadsheet the community estate. And then if there are any separate property assets, you're gonna put those on there as well. Essentially, what a what you do with a waste claim is if if you go to trial and a judge says, yes, I believe this is a legitimate waste claim, and now we're gonna reconstitute the estate, what they should do is they should take the value of the wasted asset or item. So let's just say for easy math that the waste claim was $1,000, that they believe that this one of the spouses pulled $1,000 out of the estate, maybe they have no explanation for it or not a believable one. We're gonna reconstitute the estate by $1,000. So on the spreadsheet that the judge at that point would be using, they would then essentially add in $1,000 that was missing from the community back into the community estate. And then once they've added in all the waste claims and reconstituted that estate, then they would go to divide the estate.

SPEAKER_01

Um so just to add a little bit more color to your example, say your total estate is worth $5,000. And let's say that the judge is uh going to divide it $50-50, which they don't always have to. They just have to divide it in a just and right, equitable way. But let's say the total estate is worth $5,000, but they find that there was $1,000 worth of waste. So they add that back to the community estate. So now it's worth $6,000, and they're going to divide it $50-50. You get $3,000, you get $3,000. But the party that wasted the $1,000, it's like they're only getting $2,000 of what's left. The other side is getting their full $3,000 because it's like you already got your $1,000. You wasted it, you spent it. Uh we're putting it here kind of as this like uh phantom number in the spreadsheet, and you're getting it, but you really already spent it, and your spouse shouldn't have to uh be penalized for that.

SPEAKER_00

That's exactly right. And the one of the most heartbreaking things, honestly, that I deal with with my clients is if a client comes to me and it looks like they have legitimate waste claims by that have occurred by the other spouse. But essentially the community estate has nothing in it. Right. And because at that point, there's there's not a whole lot of good options for you as the lawyer or for the judge. I mean, where where do you where do you pull money from if there's nothing to pull from? Right. So you you hope in those cases that there are some assets, whether it's a maybe a marital home with equity in it, maybe it's a retirement account, a 401k that's got some dollars in it, where you can try to make your client whole to offset the waste claim that the other spouse has committed.

SPEAKER_01

And unfortunately, if we do have a situation where the estate is not big enough to make up for uh a large waste claim, one of the things courts can do is issue an equalization payment, which is where the um offended spouse would uh get a payment made to them by the offending spouse, potentially over time. Um, but you know, when you do that, a lot of times, unless there's some sort of underlying property that they can secure it against, it's really just a piece of paper that says that the other person needs to pay you. And Texas has such stringent um rules on paying judgments that oftentimes, a lot of times that doesn't happen. So, advice that I would have for clients is start documenting this waste as soon as possible. I would also let your spouse know that you don't agree with their their spending if you um kind of in writing. In writing, yeah, in writing, yeah, while while it's actually happening, right? They go out, they they buy the $70,000 vehicle on top of the vehicle that they already have to get them from point A to point B. Tell them in writing, I do not agree, I do not consent to this. Right. Um, so that way you have some evidence that uh this was you know something that you didn't agree to, and keep records of all that, keep screenshots of that. Uh go through your bank statements for your lawyer and and document what you see as wasteful spending. Potentially it's spending money on a paramour or an affair, or you know, it's money for the hotel, or it's just um spending extravagant amounts of money at a bar every night. Sure. All of those things count or could count as community waste, and those good records are going to help your attorneys immeasurably.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. And I would just say to on that note, if you're somebody who's not sure if you need to get a divorce, but you are in a marriage where you think your partner is spending lavishly or might be engaged in wasteful spending, I would just encourage you to um try to have a conversation with them about what's going on and get the answers that make sense to you. Um if they're not willing to do that, then then then divorce might need to be an option because often what happens with with me is that clients will come to me and they will tell me that for years they have been suspicious or for years they have known something was going on, but they just weren't sure what and they didn't press the issue and they let it lie. And then once we peel the onion back, we find out that the situation is much worse than they ever imagined, and now their options are really limited.

SPEAKER_01

So if your spouse is hiding assets, or you know that your spouse is wasting assets, my the biggest piece of advice, and what I would want folks to take away from this is to be proactive, is to find a lawyer that can help guide you through this legal process, take note of the records, go and get the records. Lawyers will use, our firm certainly knows how to use the legal tools available to us to go and get that information. We are going to get that information, whether they try to keep it from us or not. Um, and in the end, it's gonna bite them in the behind. But go and find a legal representative that can advocate for you and uh can get on top of this problem before it blows out of proportion, or you know, you've got the situation that's been going on for years and years and years and gets beyond our control. Yeah. Well, David, thank you so much for joining me today, and um we'll see you next time.